Tech Note: TN1010-1: Proposition 23, the Impact on Nevada County

Russ Steele

Abstract - The total cost of implementing Assembly Bill 32, the California Global
Warming Solutions Act of 2006, has been the subject of controversy since the California
Air Resources Board (ARB) released its first economic analysis in September 2008. Each
subsequent economic analysis, including those commissioned by CARB indicated AB32
implementation would be a net cost to consumers. Thus, industry groups, legislators,
business owners, independent consultants, and the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO)
have all been critical of ARB’s cost estimates. With the current state of the economy, the
public is becoming increasingly concerned about the negative impact of AB32‘s
implementation on California’s economic future. After examining the economic issues
SESF concludes that passing Proposition 23 will have a positive economic impact on
Nevada County.

You can download here: Download Prop-23 Tech Note_10-04a

Comments

[Steve Frisch]

Wow, how did I miss this? You mean all that time you have been implying that Sierra Business Council should not be taking a position on Prop 23, you, as a member of a non- profit board of directors, published this bogus economic analysis, and used it as a rationale for SES Foundation friends to vote yes on Prop 23?

Hypocrisy, thy name is Russ.

[Sally Brown]

I really appreciate for providing the nice info in this website. This is providing the great info in this website and nice info is visible in this website. I had really very happy for visiting the nice info in this blog. This website is providing the various topics are visible in this website. Thanks a lot for visiting the great info in this website and utilize the great service in this website.